This year students examined various texts in Jewish Studies. To further refine these skills, students are encouraged to examine two contrasting interpretations of a particular Jewish law/text and write about it on their blogfolios.
Talmudic Debate on “An Eye for an Eye”:
- Pro: Exodus 21:24-25 in the Torah (“eye for an eye”) and Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Bava Kamma 83b.
- Con: Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 84b.
Debate on Sabbath Observance:
- Pro: Exodus 20:8-11 in the Torah (Commandment to observe the Sabbath) and Mishnah Shabbat 1:1.
- Con: Mishnah Yoma 8:6 (discusses exceptions to Sabbath observance for the sake of preserving life).
Interpretations of Kosher Laws:
- Pro: Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 in the Torah (Kosher dietary laws) and Mishnah Chullin 7:6.
- Con: Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Shabbat 55a (discusses the principle of “lo bashamayim hi” – Torah is not in heaven, implying human interpretation and application of the law).
Questions to consider:
- How do these texts/interpretations differ?
- Which text/interpretation resonates with you?
- Why is this an important concept within Judaism?
- What is the lesson we can learn from studying this concept?